tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472400923228993687.post1398533123631150463..comments2024-03-26T16:19:11.382-07:00Comments on Crossdreamers: Sex, gender and nature, part 1Sally Molayhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02015510914816971645noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472400923228993687.post-23778154595964438332012-02-28T04:38:06.346-08:002012-02-28T04:38:06.346-08:00@Malaya
See female bodied Sonali's comment he...@Malaya<br /><br />See female bodied Sonali's comment <a href="http://www.crossdreamers.com/2011/12/on-statistical-difference-between-men.html" rel="nofollow">here:</a><br /><br />"I am seeing myself clearly as a femme gay man but certainly not as woman. I am a man as I am fantasizing having a man's body and being topped by another gay man."<br /><br />Now, how do you fit that into the traditional paradigm?Jack Molayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03629363646482611722noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472400923228993687.post-54770058557049235222012-02-28T03:17:30.802-08:002012-02-28T03:17:30.802-08:00I think the main challenge to the Darwin's evo...I think the main challenge to the Darwin's evolutionary principles would be not the gay men and women, but the homosexual transgenders!<br />Yes, I mean the lesbian MTFs and gay FTMs. Or even the gynephilic feminine men and androphilic butch women.<br />Once these genderqueers come out of their closets,everything we learnt from school years comes into question.<br />A male who is effeminate and still gynephilic? That itself is a big blot on the heterosexist assumptions of Darwin and such other like minded scientists.Malayanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2472400923228993687.post-34263505140744257292009-12-12T05:37:21.951-08:002009-12-12T05:37:21.951-08:00it's really hard to base anything on darwin...it's really hard to base anything on darwin's point of view, or any old research. I mean it's like basing current medical viewpoints with those of 100 years ago. 100 years ago, they'd amputate your leg if you were having knee problems, now they go in with tiny knives through 1/8 holes and shave cartilage.<br /><br />I guess what I'm saying is that transgenderism and autogynephilia is so new that we have not yet got a good grasp of what it really is. You cannot begin to understand it unless you are in fact one, and even then it doesn't even make sense to yourself.<br /><br />And even though typically once someone defines something it's hard to change the mind of the scientific community, rules do change (look at pluto, no longer a planet). I don't think it was ever clearly defined in the first place, so I can totally see a day when a new term is defined to replace autogynephilia.tg_captionerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15015206450712314680noreply@blogger.com